30.00% - Subsidizing private GMO seed patents with public dollars is corporate welfare dressed up as agricultural research policy.
25.00% - GMO regulation must be fixed to support broader societal goals.
20.00% - GMOs regulatory framework is not robust enough to respond to unexpected threats.
15.00% - A troubling application of GMO technology doesn't indict the entire field — just like one bad drug doesn't end all pharmaceutical research.
10.00% - GMO technology can be regulated with approved varieties and monitoring requirements — a blanket ban is a failure to think the problem through.
GMO can protect crops vulnerable to climate change.
23.08% - GMOs greatly increase the chances of “super weeds”.
18.46% - A seed company patenting a GMO crop is protecting years of research investment, the same way a drug company patents a new medicine — that's what makes anyone invest in the next innovation.
18.46% - Calling GMO food 'toxic' without naming a specific compound, dose, or mechanism is a scare tactic, not science.
18.46% - GMO technology can have terrible side-effects.
13.85% - You shouldn’t buy GMO because an increasded market for them could bring about environmental harm.
2.98% - No other agricultural tool responds to food supply crises as fast as GMO disease resistance and drought tolerance.
2.48% - Thirty years of commercial GMO crops, and not one cancer spike, not one ecological catastrophe — the danger argument is dead.
2.23% - Thirty years of GMO data shows no cancer spikes, no ecosystem destruction, no poisoned aquifers — apply the standard honestly, and GMO crops pass.
20.00% - GMO can protect crops vulnerable to climate change.
20.00% - GMOs offer a tool for protecting crops vulnerable to climate change.
20.00% - GMOs can help protect crops that climate change is putting at risk.
20.00% - GMOs offer a meaningful tool for protecting crops vulnerable to climate change.
20.00% - GMOs are a meaningful tool for protecting crops that climate change is putting at risk.
50.00% - Climate change denial
