You shouldn’t buy GMO because an increasded market for them could bring about environmental harm.
55.71% - GMO research needs more government support to ensure innovation benefits society
14.86% - Subsidizing private GMO seed patents with public dollars is corporate welfare dressed up as agricultural research policy.
11.14% - GMO regulation must be fixed to support broader societal goals.
7.43% - GMOs regulatory framework is not robust enough to respond to unexpected threats.
6.16% - A troubling application of GMO technology doesn't indict the entire field — just like one bad drug doesn't end all pharmaceutical research.
3.01% - Thirty years of commercial GMO crops, and not one cancer spike, not one ecological catastrophe — the danger argument is dead.
1.69% - Farmers have planted GMO soybeans since 1996 and grocery stores have carried GMO products for decades without incident — let farmers and markets keep making these calls.
50.00% - Running safety tests before scaling a new technology is responsible development — not grounds for keeping it locked in a lab indefinitely.
20.00% - Thirty years of commercial GMO crops, and not one cancer spike, not one ecological catastrophe — the danger argument is dead.
15.00% - GMO should receive more testing before sale.
10.00% - GMO crops face more rigorous safety testing than any conventional produce ever did.
5.00% - Once the FDA and USDA have checked a GMO variety for real dangers, government's role is done — the rest is between farmers and the market.
25.00% - Increased market demand for GMOs would translate into greater environmental harm.
25.00% - Growing demand for GMO products amplifies the environmental harm associated with them.
25.00% - Expanding the GMO market produces proportionally greater environmental harm.
12.50% - You shouldn’t buy GMO because an increasded market for them could bring about environmental harm.
12.50% - Buying GMO products contributes to environmental harm by expanding the market for them.