GMOs greatly increase the chances of “super weeds”.
74.29% - GMO technology can be regulated with approved varieties and monitoring requirements — a blanket ban is a failure to think the problem through.
7.43% - The current regulatory framework for GMOs is insufficient.
5.57% - Intellectual property laws need reform.
3.71% - "Termination seeds" should be banned.
2.75% - Thirty years of commercial GMO crops, and not one cancer spike, not one ecological catastrophe — the danger argument is dead.
2.38% - A troubling application of GMO technology doesn't indict the entire field — just like one bad drug doesn't end all pharmaceutical research.
2.01% - Thirty years of GMO data shows no cancer spikes, no ecosystem destruction, no poisoned aquifers — apply the standard honestly, and GMO crops pass.
1.86% - You shouldn’t eat GMOs
20.00% - Thirty years of commercial GMO crops, and not one cancer spike, not one ecological catastrophe — the danger argument is dead.
20.00% - Running safety tests before scaling a new technology is responsible development — not grounds for keeping it locked in a lab indefinitely.
20.00% - Once a technology is understood, the next step is deploying it — that's how every agricultural advance from hybrid seed to tractors got adopted.
20.00% - No test can eliminate every theoretical unknown — at some point you accept the evidence and let farmers use the technology.
20.00% - Farmers have planted GMO soybeans since 1996 and grocery stores have carried GMO products for decades without incident — let farmers and markets keep making these calls.
20.00% - GMOs greatly increase the chances of “super weeds”.
20.00% - GMO cultivation substantially increases the risk of resistant weed species.
20.00% - GMO farming materially increases the threat of weeds that resist control.
20.00% - GMO cultivation contributes substantially to the rise of herbicide-resistant weeds.
20.00% - GMO cultivation materially increases the spread of weeds that resist control.
50.00% - Glossary of agriculture