60.00% - The current regulatory framework for GMOs is insufficient.
16.00% - Intellectual property laws need reform.
12.00% - "Termination seeds" should be banned.
8.00% - You shouldn’t eat GMOs
4.00% - Ban GMO crop sales and you push development to China and Brazil with no oversight, while American farmers buy those same seeds on the black market.
GMO research needs more government support to ensure innovation benefits society
75.81% - Once the FDA and USDA have checked a GMO variety for real dangers, government's role is done — the rest is between farmers and the market.
4.62% - The government couldn't stop NAFTA from shipping jobs overseas or opioids from flooding rural towns — it sure isn't going to protect us from a GMO soybean.
4.62% - GMO crops face more rigorous safety testing than any conventional produce ever did.
4.62% - GMO should receive more testing before sale.
4.62% - Thirty years of commercial GMO crops, and not one cancer spike, not one ecological catastrophe — the danger argument is dead.
3.22% - Subsidizing private GMO seed patents with public dollars is corporate welfare dressed up as agricultural research policy.
2.50% - Seed companies need to recoup R&D investment before funding the next crop — no return, no next drought-resistant variety.
20.00% - GMO research needs more government support to ensure innovation benefits society
20.00% - GMO research requires greater government support to direct innovation toward public benefit.
20.00% - Government support for GMO research is needed to direct it toward public good rather than profit.
20.00% - Government support for GMO research is needed to keep it accountable to the public interest.
20.00% - Government support for GMO research is needed to keep it accountable to public interest.
50.00% - Genetically modified food controversies
