55.00% - There are legitimate cases of the excesses of “Cancel Culture”
45.00% - “Cancel Culture” should have agreed up terms for when the label is appropriate.
A person should only be considered canceled if their livelihood has actually been destroyed.
40.00% - “Cancel Culture” should have agreed up terms for when the label is appropriate.
35.00% - Cancel culture is organized intimidation — people lose jobs and reputations for ideological impurity, not actual wrongdoing.
25.00% - "Canceling" someone means diminishing their standing.
35.71% - Fighting for social justice should be celebrated.
32.14% - “Cancel Culture” should have agreed up terms for when the label is appropriate.
32.14% - There are legitimate cases of the excesses of “Cancel Culture”
100.00% - A person should only be considered canceled if their livelihood has actually been destroyed.
0.00% - Someone has to have lost their livelihood for them to have been “Canceled”
50.00% - Barefoot Gen