35.00% - The standard(s) used for a means test will always be somewhat crude and arbitrary.
31.67% - Public goods should be available to all.
20.00% - Means-testing focuses limited government resources on people who actually need them — it's not about creating in-groups; it's about not writing checks to people who don't.
13.33% - A means test helps avoid criticism that a policy is unneeded.
Means testing inevitably excludes some who need help and includes some who do not.
33.33% - Means-testing focuses limited government resources on people who actually need them — it's not about creating in-groups; it's about not writing checks to people who don't.
22.99% - Public goods should be available to all.
22.99% - The standard(s) used for a means test will always be somewhat crude and arbitrary.
10.34% - A means test helps avoid criticism that a policy is unneeded.
10.34% - A means test requires creating an in-group and out-group.
33.33% - Means testing inevitably excludes some who need help and includes some who do not.
33.33% - Means-tested eligibility produces some inclusions and exclusions that miss the program's intent.
0.00% - Means tested eligibility will always result in some people deemed eligible that are less deserving than some deemed ineligible.
50.00% - Presidential eligibility of Donald Trump
