Agitate

Because

No Results - Accept the argument to be the first to endorse

Argument 13

46 .2% of 26 users accept

GMOs exhibit a significant enough danger that they should be banned.

Genetically modified food controversies - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

Rebuttal

23.21% - GMOs regulatory framework is not robust enough to respond to unexpected threats.
20.04% - A troubling application of GMO technology doesn't indict the entire field â€” just like one bad drug doesn't end all pharmaceutical research.
19.83% - GMO technology can be regulated with approved varieties and monitoring requirements â€” a blanket ban is a failure to think the problem through.
18.57% - The current regulatory framework for GMOs is insufficient.
13.93% - GMO regulation must be fixed to support broader societal goals.
1.89% - Thirty years of commercial GMO crops, and not one cancer spike, not one ecological catastrophe â€” the danger argument is dead.
1.37% - GMO crops face more rigorous safety testing than any conventional produce ever did.
1.16% - Calling GMO food 'toxic' without naming a specific compound, dose, or mechanism is a scare tactic, not science.

Therefore

Find

Last Visited

Recent Assertions

Go to ID